Yep. The WSJ in its editorial section asked why pro-lifers found abortion morally more significant that "the rationing of care for cancer patients or at the end of life." That rationing, of course, is also implicated in the bill. They have a point there, but arguably there will always be "rationing." We simply think that the market place with do a better job than the government.
2 comments:
He told us last week he was going to "cave" when he said he "wanted to vote for universal healthcare".
That was an open invitation to the Dems and 'Big O' to give him a fig leaf to hide behind!
Ken
Yep. The WSJ in its editorial section asked why pro-lifers found abortion morally more significant that "the rationing of care for cancer patients or at the end of life." That rationing, of course, is also implicated in the bill. They have a point there, but arguably there will always be "rationing." We simply think that the market place with do a better job than the government.
Post a Comment