"Two Bisexual Women and Their Husband as Threesome." The article features a photo of the apparently happy, young people, which I've posted. The photo appeals to one's prurient interest, especially, a male's. The three people are sitting on a king-size bed, and daddy (these are parents, we learn in the article) is sitting in the middle. The hands of each person are not simply posed, they are poised. In another era, this would be scandalous. But now it is simply interesting.
What could we say that is wrong with this relationship and be able to say it without moralizing. A question comes to my mind immediately, and it is, "How does this work?" I think an accurate response to that question must be that most modern of all non-answers, "It's complicated." Another non-answer, but probably as truthful as the prior non-answer is, "It probably doesn't."
But what puzzles me is the extra time this must take for all concerned and how they will deal with that problem. We have it in our cultural memory: "Three's a crowd." Assuming that gender matters (as I do), these three people are not the same. We have two females and one male. In the group, the male is special in a technical and, finally, practical sense. But one could persuasively say that each is special, unique, one of a kind. How does the male parcel, how does he measure, himself out to the other two? How does each woman (the women are described as "bi-sexual") parcel herself out to the other two. How does one of these people not displace one of the others in all sort of essential ways at any given point. The most essential way is simply time, it seems to me.
And if a relationship is displaced by someone else, then it is less nurtured. I don't think this arrangement can work, simply speaking. It won't work. This is a snap shot, but I can imagine the movie and how it ends. In fact, I don't have to wait for the movie, I already saw the play.
Post a Comment