I finally saw this movie, via Amazon, when the price finally dropped into the realm of reasonableness. (Do people really pay $12.99 and above to watch a non-Prime Amazon movie?)
Inside all the fantastic photography and sympathetic characters and competent acting, the producers tuck a climate change theme. The aliens who climb out of the Pacific Rim and wreck havoc on the West Coast, are aliens who, millennia before, introduced the dinosaurs to our planet as a sort of guinea pig species. Those creatures died out, however, because the atmosphere was not toxic enough. So the aliens waited until humans polluted it to the extent that Earth is ready for them. So here they come.
Please.
On the other hand, humans and their technology defeat the aliens in Act 3, using a nuclear device.
So what's the moral here? Are humans and their polluting technology bad or are they good? Or do we have a mixed bag? Or are the creators of the movie just sloppy or cynical? I vote for sloppy.
Maybe we will find out in the inevitable sequel. I sure hope del Toro is doing it.
“Evidence on the impact of sustained exposure to air
pollution on life expectancy from China’s Huai River policy”
This paper's findings suggest that an arbitrary
Chinese policy that greatly increases total suspended particulates (TSPs) air
pollution is causing the 500 million residents of Northern China to lose more
than 2.5 billion life years of life expectancy. The quasi-experimental
empirical approach is based on China’s Huai River policy, which provided free
winter heating via the provision of coal for boilers in cities north of the
Huai River but denied heat to the south. Using a regression discontinuity
design based on distance from the Huai River, we find that ambient
concentrations of TSPs are about 184 μg/m3 [95% confidence interval
(CI): 61, 307] or 55% higher in the north. Further, the results indicate that
life expectancies are about 5.5 y (95% CI: 0.8, 10.2) lower in the north owing
to an increased incidence of cardiorespiratory mortality. More generally, the
analysis suggests that long-term exposure to an additional 100 μg/m3
of TSPs is associated with a reduction in life expectancy at birth of about 3.0
y (95% CI: 0.4, 5.6).
-the Abstract of a study paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 8, 2013.
-the Abstract of a study paper published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 8, 2013.
